On the Y Combinator “premium”

I’ve had the pleasure of meeting with hundreds of startup investors from all around the world, and one of the most common questions I hear is, “Are Y Combinator startups really worth their high valuations?”

I’ve been answering this question anecdotally, dropping well-known YC company names like Airbnb and Dropbox, and referencing some of YC’s impressive results statistics:

  • Cumulative valuation of top companies: $150B
  • Companies valued at $100M+: 100+
  • Jobs created by top companies: 28K+

But this lacks context, so I decided to dig in deeper and compare YC startups to non-YC startups by “vintage” as best I could, comparing the data YC recently released on its top companies with an analysis of broader seed-stage startup outcomes courtesy of CBInsights. I also pulled some data from Snappr’s wonderful YC DB project.

Here are some of my key findings:

YC startups are 3x more likely to become ‘unicorns’ — Looking at the 2008–2010 vintage, CBInsights reports that 12 venture-backed startups are now valued at $1B or more (1.1% of the total). Of the 146 companies that graduated from YC those years, 5 are now valued at $1B+ (3.4% of the total). Those companies — Airbnb, Stripe, Docker, PagerDuty & Machine Zone — are impressively nearly half of the ‘unicorns’ for the whole industry those years.

YC startups are 4.5x more likely to be valued at $100M+ — At first, I thought YC startups are ‘only’ 2.7x more likely, since CBInsights reports 31 exits from the 2008–2010 vintage at $100M+ (2.8% of the total) and YC reports 11 companies from those years valued at $100M+ (7.5% of the total). But then I noticed an interesting trend… if you look at YC’s 2011–2012 vintage, there are a whopping 31 companies valued at $100M+ (12.7% of the total). This is counter-intuitive because the younger companies should be at a disadvantage to the older companies in achieving that milestone. This means that YC’s batch quality is rising over time (more below).

YC’s batch quality is rising over time :)— This is pretty obvious when you look at the percentage of $100M+ and $1B+ companies by batch. In the chart below, $100M+ companies are in blue and $1B+ companies in red:

The trendline is definitely up-and-to-the-right, which is especially impressive when you consider that newer companies are at a disadvantage to older companies in hitting a given valuation. So, the company quality is actually improving more quickly than implied visually above. I’d expect the 2012 and later vintages to eventually have at least as many $100M+ companies as 2011, and for some of the 2011 companies to soon join the ‘unicorn’ club.

Considering all of this on top of the strong allure of seed-stage venture returns more generally, one can understand why YC Demo Days are so well-attended.

Now, back to investing in YC startups…



Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Jared Heyman

Tech guy and investor. Founder at Rebel Fund and previously Pioneer Fund. Chairman of Infosurv and CrowdMed (YC W13). Former Bain consultant. Data nerd.